Search     
The Online Community for Aircraft Mechanics!
  
Home Forums Topics Top Headlines Your Account
Directory
· Home
· Audio
· Downloads
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· News Archive
· Recommend Us
· Search
· Site Map
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· World News
· Your Account
 
Login
Welcome, Guest
Nickname
Password
(Register)

Membership:
Latest: cenkemre21
Today: 0
Yesterday: 0
Overall: 490

Visitation:
Guests: 16
Members: 0
Total: 16


You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
 
Last Seen Members
superg: 10 days ago
audai: 52 days ago
monika: 66 days ago
bycanertk: 70 days ago
ual_tech: 101 days ago
planemech669: 114 days ago
HORUS: 115 days ago
planedoctor: 116 days ago
blacklord83: 128 days ago
Ü ¬z¸¯³]: 128 days ago
missleigh: 132 days ago
 
Today in Aviation History
1953
Scott Crossfield in Douglas Skyrocket, 1st to break Mach 2 (1,300 MPH).
1980
Steve Ptacek in Solar Challenger makes 1st solar-powered flight.
 
Site Info
About PlaneDoctor.com
Advertising on this site
 

PlaneDoctor.com :: View topic - Why this site is not popular......
 
  Forum FAQ Search Profile

Post new topic Reply to topic
PlaneDoctor.com Forum Index » General BS » Why this site is not popular......   
View previous topic :: View next topic
AuthorWhy this site is not popular......
ual_tech
Employee
Employee


Joined: Jan 29, 2003
Posts: 22
Location: USA

Reply with quote
One reason why this site is not very active is in the 'fact' that our livelihood is being outsourced to the lowest bidder.

Why should we as professional technicians give tips and clarification of complex procedures and repairs to 'dummy down' our profession further?

If we were all on a level playing field then this would not be an issue.

However, we are not (at least until we are 'ALL' AMFA!!!).

Take Care,
2cigar.gif UT
PostPosted:
Sat Apr 23, 2005 3:18 pm
Top of PageView users profileSend private messageSend emailVisit posters websiteYahoo Messenger
planedoctor
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: Oct 08, 2002
Posts: 306

Reply with quote
I would agree it would be interesting if all A&P's were in the same union like most pilots.

I don't necessarily know if AMFA is the one, but I still think it would be up to the membership to make or break a union regardless what they call themselfs.

The membership is the determining factor. If they are non active and pacifists then they will be screwed, If they are vocal, very active they will have a better contract and working environment.

I know if UAL was having a contract dispute and Northwest wasn't you think the guys at northwest would do anything but rejoice.

Sad as it is that mentality needs to change.

We need to band together some how.

This site would be a great avenue to do that.
_________________
PostPosted:
Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:47 pm
Top of PageView users profileSend private messageVisit posters website
Display posts from previous:   
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Post new topic Reply to topic
PlaneDoctor.com Forum Index » General BS » Why this site is not popular......  

Jump to:  
Key
  You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Click here to view this sites Privacy Policy
© 2002 Planedoctor Web Services All Rights Reserved
Bulletin Board Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2002 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 12271 Seconds