Search     
The Online Community for Aircraft Mechanics!
  
Home Forums Topics Top Headlines Your Account
Directory
· Home
· Audio
· Downloads
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· News Archive
· Recommend Us
· Search
· Site Map
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· World News
· Your Account
 
Login
Welcome, Guest
Nickname
Password
(Register)

Membership:
Latest: RAMJETT
Today: 0
Yesterday: 0
Overall: 497

Visitation:
Guests: 17
Members: 0
Total: 17


You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
 
Last Seen Members
7793: 7 days ago
jetdoc: 9 days ago
Aviator: 15 days ago
caster: 32 days ago
talal_m7taj_com: 47 days ago
old10hourrefugee: 48 days ago
superg: 60 days ago
audai: 103 days ago
monika: 116 days ago
bycanertk: 121 days ago
ual_tech: 151 days ago
 
Today in Aviation History
1997
A Comair Embraer 120 Brasilia crashed while on approach to Detroit Metropolitan Airport. The crew was instructed to slow to 170 knots by Air Traffic Control and complied. This speed was below the stall speed of the aircraft in icing conditions, and the plane entered a spin and impacted the ground. All 29 on board were killed.
 
Site Info
About PlaneDoctor.com
Advertising on this site
 

PlaneDoctor.com :: View topic - Equity Based Compensation
 
  Forum FAQ Search Profile

Post new topic Reply to topic
PlaneDoctor.com Forum Index » Southwest Airlines » Equity Based Compensation   
View previous topic :: View next topic
AuthorEquity Based Compensation
737
Manager
Manager


Joined: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 43
Location: USA

Reply with quote
Has anyone else noticed the trend which has been taking shape lately? Specifically, I'm referring to the contract extensions which have occurred recently which have a common thread, stock options. Pilots, ramp/operations/provisioning, mechanics, dispatchers, have had equity based compensation (stock options) included in their contracts.

Currently, flight attendants & customer service are engaged in negotiations. And, SWA has notified their unions of the intent to offer stock options. And, one of the incentives to get these tentative agreements signed and approved before the end of the year is now obvious. The SEC (Securities & Exchange Commission) established new rules begining in '03, requiring shareholder approval prior to offering stock options. In effect, that would delay the bargaining process even further.

Does anyone have any thoughts on this? anim_thinking.gif
PostPosted:
Sat Dec 14, 2002 4:23 pm
Top of PageView users profileSend private message
LUVINMCO
Newbie


Joined: Dec 24, 2002
Posts: 2
Location: USA

Reply with quote
I don't have a problem with the stock options. Just like our profit sharing it gives every employee a vested interest in the companies performance. Therefore people are more likely to be frugal with the companies resources because it will effect how much ends up in our pocket down the line. As long as our benefits and wages are competitive I look at the stock options as an extra retro check of sorts, I am not going to rich off it most likely (but it could happen I guess) but an extra several thousand dollars is nice. As long as the next negotiations don't try to short us pay for more stock options I will be alright with it.
PostPosted:
Tue Dec 24, 2002 11:17 am
Top of PageView users profileSend private message
737
Manager
Manager


Joined: Nov 20, 2002
Posts: 43
Location: USA

Reply with quote
I'm in agreement with most of what you stated. Certainly, the airline industry is very volatile right now and it's important to focus on both the short and long term, as it relates to our labor agreements. If you look at LUV's historical trends and have confidence, stock-options are not a bad thing. On the other hand, I would'nt want to rely solely on equity based compensation for any cost-of-living adjustments, in lieu of "hard" dollars. Additionally, my concern over stock options are simply the procedure, ie. shareholder approval prior to presenting a tentative agreement. Another delay tactic, maybe?

Let's face it, if we all continue to do our jobs and the revenue side of the equation rises, we should be able to prosper.
anim_beer.gif
PostPosted:
Tue Dec 24, 2002 1:15 pm
Top of PageView users profileSend private message
planedoctor
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: Oct 08, 2002
Posts: 306

Reply with quote
Quote:
Just like our profit sharing it gives every employee a vested interest in the companies performance. Therefore people are more likely to be frugal with the companies resources because it will effect how much ends up in our pocket down the line.


Although it's documented that employee owned companies do OK one shouldn't forget the one that really sucked at it and is in our industry. UAL's ESOP is proof the above statement isn't true. Granted I would have thought prior to this happening with UAL that a companies employee's would strive to make the company profitable, but I guess not! I would rather say accepting stock options would have to be "icing on the cake."

Be cautious about stocks and the false hopes of feeling part owner. Do you remember all the horror stories of the people who lost everything when ENRON fell?

LOVINMCO made a good point anim_smoke.gif
Quote:
I am not going to rich off it most likely (but it could happen I guess) but an extra several thousand dollars is nice. As long as the next negotiations don't try to short us pay for more stock options I will be alright with it.

_________________
PostPosted:
Tue Dec 24, 2002 4:38 pm
Top of PageView users profileSend private messageVisit posters website
planedoctor
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: Oct 08, 2002
Posts: 306

Reply with quote
There was a interesting article written about ESOP's and how USAir and UAL's work. You can find it HERE
_________________
PostPosted:
Thu Dec 26, 2002 10:17 am
Top of PageView users profileSend private messageVisit posters website
RDUCALTECH
Intern
Intern


Joined: Nov 27, 2002
Posts: 7
Location: USA

Reply with quote
If you didn't know CAL has a employee stock purchase plan, sold to particpating employees at the end of every qtr. The plan ran out of stock in Nov. It won't be till May when and if the Board of directors approve more stock to be sold to employees at a 15% discount. As you can surely figure, they had plenty stock to sell at 35.00 a share. anim_whacko.gif
PostPosted:
Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:43 pm
Top of PageView users profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:   
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Post new topic Reply to topic
PlaneDoctor.com Forum Index » Southwest Airlines » Equity Based Compensation  

Jump to:  
Key
  You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Click here to view this sites Privacy Policy
© 2002 Planedoctor Web Services All Rights Reserved
Bulletin Board Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2002 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 12315 Seconds