Search     
The Online Community for Aircraft Mechanics!
  
Home Forums Topics Top Headlines Your Account
Directory
· Home
· Audio
· Downloads
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· News Archive
· Recommend Us
· Search
· Site Map
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· World News
· Your Account
 
Login
Welcome, Guest
Nickname
Password
(Register)

Membership:
Latest: RAMJETT
Today: 0
Yesterday: 0
Overall: 497

Visitation:
Guests: 12
Members: 0
Total: 12


You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
 
Last Seen Members
7793: 6 days ago
jetdoc: 8 days ago
Aviator: 14 days ago
caster: 31 days ago
talal_m7taj_com: 46 days ago
old10hourrefugee: 47 days ago
superg: 59 days ago
audai: 102 days ago
monika: 115 days ago
bycanertk: 120 days ago
ual_tech: 150 days ago
 
Today in Aviation History
1982
The Airbus A300 FFCC is certified, becoming the first wide body airliner with cockpit accommodations for only two to be certified.
2003
A Turkish Airlines plane with 76 passengers and crew on board crashes while coming in to land at Diyarbakir.
 
Site Info
About PlaneDoctor.com
Advertising on this site
 

PlaneDoctor.com :: View topic - Our union reps
 
  Forum FAQ Search Profile

Post new topic Reply to topic
PlaneDoctor.com Forum Index » Continental Airlines » Our union reps   
View previous topic :: View next topic
AuthorOur union reps
DC8guru
Intern
Intern


Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 5
Location: USA

Reply with quote
There has been rumor that the Teamsters has had our head shop steward traveling to UAL's bases attempting to get UAL mechs to change their union to the Teamsters. 1nono.gif
First of all why is CAL paying our union reps to recruit for other airlines? Second why would we even be wanting UAL to have the same union in the case of a merger? Would'nt that give all of their members seniority over most of CAL mechs? I believe that this type of activity should stop immediately. If it is the intentions of the teamsters to sell us out then they should be replaced. moon.gif
PostPosted:
Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:09 am
Top of PageView users profileSend private message
planedoctor
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: Oct 08, 2002
Posts: 306

Reply with quote
18-3 paragraph M states

Quote:
Effective upon signing of this Agreement, the Company will assume the
cost of one hundred and seventy-three hours (173.0) of straight pay time
per month for each location where two hundred and fifty (250) or more
actively employed covered employees are based, and eighty-seven and
one-half hours (87.5) for locations where more than two hundred (200)
but less than two hundred and fifty (250) actively employed covered
employees are based. This time is to be used only for conducting Union
business. The time may be used by one or more shop stewards as
designated by the Local Union Business representative, or his designee.


Time may be used by one or more shop stewards as designated by the Local Union Business representative.

I actually inquired about this. It's not a rumor...it happened and is happening. Most of the time is off the clock! I'm sure the Shop Stewards expenses are being taken care of, but he's not being paid for his assistance. Only his regular 40 per week.

I have been told directly by this person that CAL was informed about this. The contract allows time to be used as the Local Business rep designates.

If the Chief Shop Steward has been neglecting his duties and all fell apart when he was gone I would be the first to yell FOUL. I really haven't heard of any issues.


You got it all wrong brother!
Quote:
Second why would we even be wanting UAL to have the same union in the case of a merger?

Having both work forces in the same union would make a merger all that easier. It's all done by Hire date. How invasive is that. Your a low timer...your at the bottom, no matter who bought who. You really think CAL would buy UAL?? You would want it all based on hire date. Anything else would be a major battle, and the little company would ultimately loose.

How do you feel the Teamsters are selling us out? I mean you think the Teamsters have a ounce of pull in what CAL does for CAL. You think their having secret meetings behind our backs lining up ways to screw us? anim_whacko.gif

Although I really do have some continuing issues with the Teamster Organization, I really do believe they gave us a rock solid work scope. Look at what the rest of the industry has done.

A union is more about it's members and how they react and acts then the name it calls itself! anim_smoke.gif
_________________
PostPosted:
Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:04 pm
Top of PageView users profileSend private messageVisit posters website
Display posts from previous:   
All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Post new topic Reply to topic
PlaneDoctor.com Forum Index » Continental Airlines » Our union reps  

Jump to:  
Key
  You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Click here to view this sites Privacy Policy
© 2002 Planedoctor Web Services All Rights Reserved
Bulletin Board Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2002 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 12314 Seconds