Search     
The Online Community for Aircraft Mechanics!
  
Home Forums Topics Top Headlines Your Account
Directory
· Home
· Audio
· Downloads
· FAQ
· Feedback
· Forums
· News Archive
· Recommend Us
· Search
· Site Map
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· World News
· Your Account
 
Login
Welcome, Guest
Nickname
Password
(Register)

Membership:
Latest: audai
Today: 0
Yesterday: 0
Overall: 489

Visitation:
Guests: 16
Members: 0
Total: 16


You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
 
Last Seen Members
audai: 8 days ago
monika: 21 days ago
bycanertk: 26 days ago
ual_tech: 57 days ago
planemech669: 70 days ago
HORUS: 71 days ago
planedoctor: 72 days ago
blacklord83: 84 days ago
Ü ¬z¸¯³]: 84 days ago
missleigh: 88 days ago
jetboy: 93 days ago
 
Today in Aviation History
1919
KLM is formed.
1996
First flight of the Boeing 777-200ER.
 
Site Info
About PlaneDoctor.com
Advertising on this site
 

PlaneDoctor™: FAA News

Search on This Topic:   
[ Go to Home | Select a New Topic ]

 FAA seeks $10.2M fine against Southwest Airlines for safety violations
Posted by planedoctor on Friday, March 07, 2008 @ 17:05:16 EST (471 reads)
FAA News

WASHINGTON – The Federal Aviation Administration said Thursday it would fine Southwest Airlines Co. $10.2 million for safety violations that included knowingly flying more than three dozen jets without mandatory inspections for structural damage.

The fine would be the largest ever levied against an airline, the FAA said.

When Southwest belatedly conducted the inspections, it found cracks in the bodies of six Boeing 737-300s, with the largest measuring 4 inches. Serious fractures can depressurize an aircraft and in 1988 caused an Aloha Airlines jet to rip apart, killing a flight attendant.

The FAA announced the fine a week before congressional investigators were to disclose findings from their own inquiry into Southwest's failure to meet airworthiness directives. That investigation was prompted by information provided by Dallas-based FAA inspectors who said their supervisors allowed the planes to keep flying even after Southwest reported its failure to make the scheduled inspections.

(Read More... | comments? | Printer Friendly Page  Send to a Friend  Create a PDF | Score: 0)
 Jets Had Near Miss at BWI, FAA Says.
Posted by planedoctor on Saturday, December 15, 2007 @ 17:43:15 EST (310 reads)
FAA News superg writes "LINTHICUM, Md. (AP): Two passenger jets passed within 300 feet of each other while one was landing and the other taking off at Baltimore-Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport last week, a federal aviation official said.


The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the incident, which occurred at the intersection of two runways Sunday night.

The near-collision occurred the same week that congressional investigators released a report on an investigation that found air travelers face a high risk of a catastrophic collision on U.S. airport runways because of faltering federal leadership, malfunctioning technology and overworked controllers.

The Government Accountability Office said that in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, there were 370 runway incursions — an aircraft, vehicle or person that enters a space reserved for takeoff or landing.

In the BWI incident, a Comair flight taking off from the airport flew over a US Airways plane that had just landed, Federal Aviation Administration spokesman Jim Peters said. "
(Read More... | 1 comment | Printer Friendly Page  Send to a Friend  Create a PDF | Score: 0)
 Final Rule: Enhanced Airworthiness Program for Airplane Systems/Fuel Tank Safety
Posted by planedoctor on Thursday, November 15, 2007 @ 19:12:41 EST (442 reads)
FAA News

Final Rule: Enhanced Airworthiness Program for Airplane Systems/Fuel Tank Safety

Background

During the late 1990s, the FAA and industry determined they needed a better understanding of wire-related failures that could result in arcing, smoke in the cabin or flight deck, and sometimes even onboard fires. The Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Enhanced Airworthiness Program for Airplane Systems (EAPAS), which was established in 2001, has been developing enhancements for continued safety of aircraft wiring systems from their design, installation, and maintenance throughout their operational life.

The EAPAS program led to a proposed rule in October 2005 that, for the first time, viewed aircraft wiring as important systems on their own. The rule proposed to revise current maintenance practices and specified other actions to address issues of aging and degradation in wiring.

The final rule, comprehensive in addressing all aspects of electrical wiring design, installation and maintenance for transport airplanes, was published on November 8, 2007. It is the result of recommendations made by industry groups working with the FAA and international authorities to increase the safety of airplane electrical wiring systems.

(Read More... | comments? | Printer Friendly Page  Send to a Friend  Create a PDF | Score: 0)
 New FAA Rule Boosts Aircraft Wiring Safety
Posted by planedoctor on Thursday, November 15, 2007 @ 19:08:27 EST (439 reads)
FAA News

WASHINGTON, DC — The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) today finalized a new rule designed to mitigate conditions that put airliners at risk for wire failures, smoke and fire.

The final rule greatly enhances the safety requirements for design, installation and maintenance of electrical wiring in new and existing airplane designs. It moves existing rules on wiring into a single section of the regulations, and adds new certification standards to address wire degradation and inadequate design or maintenance.

“We’ve gained enormous knowledge about aircraft wiring issues over the last decade,” said FAA Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety Nicholas A. Sabatini. “With this rule, we are ensuring that wiring systems will be properly designed, installed and maintained over the life of the airplane.”

(Read More... | comments? | Printer Friendly Page  Send to a Friend  Create a PDF | Score: 0)
 FAA, Build A Plane Partner to Pair Students with Retired Airplanes
Posted by deccal on Monday, June 19, 2006 @ 23:19:30 EDT (1320 reads)
FAA News

WASHINGTON — Budding high school mechanics may find themselves working on old airplanes instead of junked cars thanks to a new agreement signed today by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Build A Plane organization.

Under the agreement, the FAA and Build A Plane will join forces to help give more aviation-minded students hands-on experience working on real airplanes. Each organization will use its unique resources to send retired aircraft to schools looking to establish an aviation maintenance program.

“Working together, we hope to strongly encourage young people to consider aviation maintenance and manufacturing as a career,” said FAA Administrator Marion C. Blakey. “This program has the potential to help build the next generation of world-class American aerospace workers.”

(Read More... | 1 comment | Printer Friendly Page  Send to a Friend  Create a PDF | Score: 0)
 FAA Delays New Drug-Testing Rule, But Opposition Remains
Posted by deccal on Wednesday, April 05, 2006 @ 10:43:38 EDT (1005 reads)
FAA News

By Adrian Schofield/Aviation Daily

The FAA is delaying by six months the introduction of a rule that extends the scope of its drug- and alcohol-testing program, but the delay has not eased the repair station industry's concerns about the rule.

The agency had already established a compliance date of April 10 for the new drug testing rule, which was issued in January. Yesterday, however, FAA said the compliance date will be pushed back to Oct. 10. The new rule is intended to make sure that all repair and maintenance sub-contractors are included in the program, FAA said. FAA said the delay is necessary because "it has come to our attention that some original equipment manufacturers and other entities may be confused regarding whether they are performing maintenance or preventative maintenance duties [that are] subject to drug and alcohol testing, or manufacturing duties not subject to testing."

(Read More... | 2 comments | Printer Friendly Page  Send to a Friend  Create a PDF | Score: 0)
 NTSB Releases Preliminary facts on El Paso Mechanic Fatality
Posted by deccal on Wednesday, February 08, 2006 @ 20:03:49 EST (758 reads)
FAA News

The NTSB has released a preliminary report on the tragic accident that occurred last month in which a mechanic was killed when he inexplicably stepped in front of a 737 engine during a high-power run-up.

NTSB Identification: DFW06FA056
Scheduled 14 CFR Part 121: Air Carrier operation of Continental Airlines (D.B.A. operation of Continental Airlines)
Accident occurred Monday, January 16, 2006 in El Paso, TX
Aircraft: Boeing 737-500, registration: N32626
Injuries: 1 Fatal, 119 Uninjured.
 
This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed.

On January 16, 2006 at 0905 mountain standard time, Continental Airlines flight 1515, a Boeing 737-524 airplane, N32626, was preparing for departure from El Paso International Airport (ELP), El Paso Texas when a mechanic was fatally injured while performing a maintenance trouble shooting procedure for a suspected engine oil leak on the number 2 engine. The aircraft was being operated as a scheduled domestic passenger flight under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 121. The flight was scheduled to depart at 0910 with a destination of George Bush Intercontinental/Houston Airport (IAH), Houston, Texas. Visual meteorological conditions existed at the time, and an instrument flight plan was on file for the flight. The 5 crew members and 114 passengers were not injured.
(Read More... | comments? | Printer Friendly Page  Send to a Friend  Create a PDF | Score: 1)
 FAA Proposes $840,000 Civil Penalty Against Cessna Aircraft Company
Posted by deccal on Wednesday, February 01, 2006 @ 00:05:00 EST (762 reads)
FAA News

KANSAS CITY, MO – The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has proposed to impose a civil penalty of $840,000 against the Cessna Aircraft Company, Wichita, Kansas, for allegedly failing to comply with Federal Aviation Regulations.

The FAA alleged Cessna could not ensure that 42 new aircraft had been manufactured in accordance with the FAA-approved type design and were in condition for safe operation.

The FAA found several discrepancies in flight control rigging on aircraft under construction during an inspection of Cessna’s Independence, Kansas, facility on February 23 and 24, 2005. After that inspection, Cessna found several more cable problems on March 3, 2005.

(Read More... | comments? | Printer Friendly Page  Send to a Friend  Create a PDF | Score: 0)
 FAA Proposes $500,000 Civil Penalty Against Alaska Airlines
Posted by deccal on Wednesday, January 11, 2006 @ 09:19:59 EST (866 reads)
FAA News

RENTON, WA – The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has proposed to assess a $500,000 civil penalty against Alaska Airlines of Seattle for allegedly operating a Boeing 737 aircraft on 478 flights when it was not in compliance with federal aviation regulations.

The FAA alleged that between July 12 and December 2, 2004, Goodrich Aviation Technical Services, Inc., an Alaska Airlines authorized repair and maintenance vendor, performed extensive maintenance on a Boeing 737, but failed to reinstall the floor proximity lighting system’s emergency exit identifier lights, as required by Alaska’s Continuous Airworthiness Maintenance Program. Without this cabin floor lighting system the aircraft is not in compliance with regulations and may not be operated in revenue service.

(Read More... | 2 comments | Printer Friendly Page  Send to a Friend  Create a PDF | Score: 4)
 FAA Proposes Rule to Reduce Fuel Tank Explosion Risk
Posted by deccal on Monday, November 14, 2005 @ 20:02:42 EST (712 reads)
FAA News

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) today proposed a rule that would make aviation significantly safer by requiring more than 3,200 existing and certain new large passenger jets to reduce flammability levels of fuel tank vapors.

"Safer fuel tanks on aircraft will help prevent the possibility of future explosions and the tragic loss of lives," U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman Y. Mineta said.

The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) would require aircraft operators to reduce the flammability levels of fuel tank vapors on the ground and in the air to remove the likelihood of a potential explosion from an ignition source. The proposed rule is designed to reduce the likelihood of a repeat of the three fuel tank explosions over the past 14 years, including the 1996 TWA 800 accident, that together have resulted in 346 fatalities.

"This proposed rule is the next step to close the book on fuel tank explosions," said FAA Administrator Marion C. Blakey. "We're proposing to increase the level of aircraft safety by reducing the potentially explosive ingredient of flammable fuel vapors."

(Read More... | 1 comment | Printer Friendly Page  Send to a Friend  Create a PDF | Score: 0)
Todays Big Story
There isn't a Biggest Story for Today, yet.
 
Airline Stocks
 
Latest Survey
Who makes the hand tools in your box?

Sears- Craftsman
Snap-On
Mac
SK Tools
Cheep Taiwan Crap
Others not mentioned



Results
Polls

Votes: 201
Comments: 0
 
Express Yourself
Authors Wanted
Click here for details
 
Old News
Saturday, November 12
· FAA Awards Airborne Internet Contract (624 reads)
Tuesday, October 18
· FAA Updates Rule on Airline Seats (500 reads)
Saturday, October 08
· FAA Addresses Mitsubishi MU-2 Safety Concerns (510 reads)
Friday, August 26
· FAA Announces Decision on Child Safety Seats (565 reads)
Sunday, July 24
· Independence Air's Big Fine Isn't Its First (518 reads)
Monday, April 04
· FAA Proposes Removal or Modification of Aircraft Insulation Blankets (548 reads)
Thursday, February 19
· FAA Honors American Airlines Maintenance Operation (409 reads)
Tuesday, February 17
· FAA to Order Fuel Safety Systems on Jets (370 reads)
Wednesday, February 11
· FAA: Mechanic didn't break rules (452 reads)
 

Click here to view this sites Privacy Policy
© 2002 Planedoctor Web Services All Rights Reserved
Bulletin Board Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
Version 2.0.6 of PHP-Nuke Port by Tom Nitzschner © 2002 www.toms-home.com
Web site engine's code is Copyright © 2002 by PHP-Nuke. All Rights Reserved. PHP-Nuke is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
Page Generation: 0.227 Seconds